Iraq: Ominous Parallels to Vietnam
Iraq and Vietnam are two countries that will be long remembered for being a quagmire for United States troops. Although the United States lost exponentially more men in Vietnam than in Iraq so far, (58,000 compared to 2,878) both wars are/were very unpopular worldwide. However, the proposed invasion of Iraq was extremely unpopular at the outset. Unlike Vietnam, worldwide protests against the invasion (which are the largest anti-war protests to date) started before the war itself did. Furthermore, according to the Pew Research Center, a war conducted by the “coalition” forces would get a worldwide approval of only 10%. Clearly, the Coalition does not represent the forces of liberty and democracy. In fact, Rumsfeld and Bush had declared that they would invade Iraq regardless of the U.N.’s stance on the issue, and regardless of public opinion abroad.
Although the war in Iraq is arguably even more unpopular than the Vietnam conflict, both wars are wars of aggression. In the Vietnam war, the United States interfered in proposed elections for a national leader of a united Vietnam because it was fairly obvious that Ho Chi Minh, a communist, would win a landslide victory. In short, the United States sent large numbers of advisors and frontline troops to Vietnam in order to prevent the Vietnamese from voting the wrong way in a free election. In Iraq, the public was mislead into believing that Saddam Hussein was directly involved in the attacks of 9/11, that he was a direct supporter of Al-Queida, that he had WMD, and that he was therefore a threat to the United States. The purpose of the Vietnam War was to stop the spread of an ideology (communism), not of WMD. Today, the public is a little bit more free thinking than at the time of the Vietnam conflict, and although we are far from free of ignorance, the public is able to make better decisions now than it was then. The Vietnam war had more support at the outset, because the world was afraid of the scourge of communism. Today, that is not the case, so people can make a more informed decision when they face the prospect of going to war. Unfortunately, that didn’t stop Bush. However, it did lead do a large amount of dissent, both at home and abroad. This dissent was met by contempt for democracy:
“In the two major European countries, Germany and France, the official government stands corresponded to the views of the large majority of their populations, which unequivocally opposed the war. That led to bitter condemnation by Washington and many commentators.” (Chomsky)
The war in Iraq is eating the heart out of the United States, just as the Vietnam war did 40 years ago. Sadly, the debate is no longer about the best interests of our citizens and soldiers, but about which of our two incompetent major parties will “cut and run” first. Still worse is the fact that this international atrocity is being done in our name, with our taxes, just as Vietnam was.
November 29th, 2006 at 9:54 am
I agree with you Tim, but do not forget that 40 years ago the idea of communism was basicaly a weapon of mass destruction to not only the U.S. Government, but also the American people. Was this fear of communism forced on to the people by the government, probably. But we can not forget that even the fear of communism could not stop the the people from turning on the Gov.
November 29th, 2006 at 10:02 am
AALLLAAAHHH ackbar my borthers, we agree with the heratic that your nation of infidels does not belong in our cradle of civilization. You shall flee back to your shores as your money flees to my wallet! You shall never defeat us, unless you kill us all, which is impossible! You have learned nothing from your war on the veitnames. You msut secure aareas of the country side, anf ofrtify them byond belief, after which you must secure the cities and block all acess to them except from two directions. then confiscate the weapons and hid them from us! haha, but you are far to bent to the will of your idiotic defense minister rumsfeld to do anything like that!